Placental Relations: Theology, Viability, and Roe v. Wade

twhoshaw

What if Roe v. Wade was wiser than either its defenders or its critics realized? In this post, I take an unconventional path through medieval theology, Peter Sloterdijk’s philosophy of the placenta, and Hildegard of Bingen’s vision of ensoulment to argue that the Roe Court’s viability standard wasn’t arbitrary legal improvisation — it was judicial wisdom rooted in a remarkably consistent convergence of theological tradition and modern medicine. Along the way, I make the case that consistent originalism actually leads to a more radical pro-choice conclusion than Roe ever did, and that Dobbs, for all its claims of constitutional fidelity, is just as extra-legal as the decision it overturned — only less honest about it.