Bubbles, a Reading

– AI-generated art based on Bubbles by Sir John Everett Millais (1886) –


A reading of the first few pages (17-19) of Peter Sloterdijk’s Bubbles:

The child stands enraptured on the balcony, holding its new present and watching the soap bubbles float into the sky as it blows them out of the little loop in front of his mouth.

Now a swarm of bubbles erupts upwards, as chaotically vivacious as a throw of shimmering blue marbles. Then at a subsequent attempt, a large oval balloon filled with timid life quivers off the loop and floats down to the street, carried along by the breeze.

It is followed by the hopes of the delighted child floating out into the space in its own magic bubble, as if for a few seconds its fate depended on that of the nervous entity. When the bubble finally bursts after a trembling, drawn out flight, the soap bubble artist on the balcony emits a sound that is at once a sigh and a cheer.

For the duration of the bubble’s life, the blower was outside himself, as if the little orb survival depended on remaining encased in an attention that floated out with it. Any lack of accompaniment, any waning of that solidarity, hope, and anxiety would have damned the iridescent object to premature failure.

But even when, immersed in the eager supervision of its creator, it was allowed to drift off through space for a wonderful while, it still had to vanish into nothingness in the end. In the place where the orb burst, the blower’s excorporated soul was left alone for a moment, as if it had embarked on a shared expedition, only to lose its partner halfway.

But the melancholy lasts no more than a second before the joy of playing returns with its time-honored cruel momentum. What are broken hopes, but opportunities for new attempts?

The game continues tirelessly. Once again, the orbs float from on high. And once again, the blower assists his works of art with attentive joy in their flight through the delicate space.

There is a solidarity between the soap bubble and its blower that excludes the rest of the world. And each time the shimmering entity drifts into the distance, the little artist exits his body on the balcony to be entirely with the objects he has called into existence.

In the ecstasy of attentiveness, the child’s consciousness has virtually left its corporal source. In the orbs, his exhaled air has separated from him and is now preserved and carried further.

At the same time, the child is transported away from itself by losing itself in the breathless co-flight of its attention through the animated space. For its creator, the soap bubble thus becomes the medium of a surprising soul expansion. The bubble and its blower coexist in a field spread out through attentive involvement.

The child that follows its soap bubbles into the open is no Cartesian subject remaining planted on its extensionless thought point while observing an extended thing on its course through space. In enthusiastic solidarity with his iridescent globes, the experimenting player plunges into the open space and transforms his own between the eye and the object into an animated sphere.

All eyes and attention, the child’s face opens itself up to the space in front of it. Now the plain child imperceptibly gains an insight in the midst of its joyful entertainment that it will later forget under the strain of school: that the spirit in its own way is in space.

It’s Giving (Momma) Bear: On the Way Out of Goals, Passion, and Misery

We seem to know that goals make us miserable. But we keep setting them anyway, like clockwork—because we don’t know how to live without them. Jenny Craig is counting on that.

FX’s hit series The Bear helpfully illustrates why we are not wrong to think that goals are the literalization of our passions, and that our passions are the sources of our misery. Passion makes us miserable because it immunizes us against receiving (the touch of) O/others. 

But The Bear also reveals something else: maternal love—unexpected, unconditional—can free us from passion’s grip.

In season 3, episode 9 of The Bear, Uncle Jimmy (Oliver Platt) makes a distinction between passions and goals (You can watch the entire scene here):

Well, dreams are a son of a bitch, aren’t they? I went to this lecture series, U of Chicago. . . . Anyway, dreams, they always. . . start from a place of passion, right?

And, by the way, when I say dreams, I mean goals, not like when you’re, you know, asleep and you’re stuck at the bottom of a swimming pool, and your fucking teeth keep floating up out of your head. And you look down, and you have a fucking tattoo of a bulldog on your cock.

Anyway, so I’m at this lecture, and it’s called The Day Tomorrow Began, right? It’s all about these breakthroughs in, like, science and fucking culture and whatever . . . . Crazy fucking shit, let me tell you. Like carbon dating . . . .  It’s inspiring, really.

Because it’s kind of like, if you really nurture these dreams, these goals, no matter how batshit crazy they sound—and trust me. There are, like, 15 more of these breakthroughs—positively fucking idiotic, right?

But you can make an impact, right? You can actually change the fucking world, as long as you have a place like the university to, you know, take care of you, to let you do your thing, let you drive, right?

And, uh, keep you financed. I just remember the whole time thinking, “Whew, not everything can be that. . . .”

Jimmy’s lecture mirrors a dream of floating teeth and bulldog-tatted cocks, but its warning about passion is clear enough.

Dreams, “like when you’re, you know, asleep,” are “a place of passion.” Goals “start from a place of passion,” from your dreams. Your dreams (re)surface your passions. In your dreams, your “teeth” come out of your head to speak your mind, and your “dog” is free to sniff out a place to piss on the world. 

Goals (i.e., teeth and bulldogs) are forms of passion. And they ain’t pleasant. They’re “a son of a bitch,” “crazy fucking shit,” and “positively fucking idiotic.”

The idiotic—or passionate—person hasn’t lost their mind. Their teeth are speaking it. What they’ve lost is their head—their, I say, pleasure.

Passion sacrifices pleasure. As the late Leo Bersani writes, “Passion is an obstacle to pleasure” (Receptive Bodies, vii). 

Passion blocks your pleasure by immunizing you against the reception of O/others—for example, the university you need to “take care of you,” the investors you need to “keep you financed,” the business partner, family members, and/or girlfriend you need to run a successful restaurant and experience something like a good life. 

Your goals get realized—if they do—in spite of you. More importantly, goals immunize you against yourself. 

In season 4 of The Bear, we learn that being a world-class chef is more than Carm (Jeremy Allen White) can bear (You can watch the final scene of season 4 here and here):

I—I think I have put a lot of stuff in the way, of not dealing with other stuff. . . . And I think I’m trying to run into that. All right. So, I’m not blocked by it anymore. I’m not scared of it anymore. I’m not sprinting from it anymore.

. . . . 

I don’t know what I’m like, Richie. . . . Like, outside of the kitchen.

We know what Carm is like inside the kitchen. He is like his mother inside the kitchen (I only recently completed watching season 2 of The Bear because episode 6, “Ma Does Seven Fishes,” caused me so much anxiety that I could not bear to finish watching it). 

Carm’s curiosity about what he’s like outside the kitchen is also inspired by his mother, who is now in a similar position. Donna (Jamie Lee Curtis) offers her apology for years of parental neglect just outside of their family home’s kitchen (You can watch the scene here):

I’m trying to make things better. And I am–I’m here asking if I can be part of your life again because I miss you. And I– I know I never said it enough–I know I didn’t–but I love you, Carmen.

You’re my baby bear. I know. And I love you. And I’m so sorry. I just didn’t say it enough. I just didn’t.

Donna’s unexpected apology—her unexpected expression of sincere maternal love—somehow moves Carm to think about his pleasure, about who he may be outside of the kitchen.

Maternal love redeems us from our passions, and it opens us to ourselves. Lots of love to you, dear reader, in 2026.