Articles for author: twhoshaw

AI DOC Harris Tristan film cover on APOCALOPTIMISM.

Are you an APOCALOPTIMIST? I am.

Tristan Harris's "apocaloptimism" — political activism for a pro-human AI future — may be missing something crucial: *the anti-human present is already here.* Drawing on queer theory, Pauline theology, and a revealing visit to Judson Memorial Church, this post argues that the proliferation of AIs reflects our collective exhaustion with the tedium of modern life and its normative authorities. Where the church offers the tired prescription of more God-talk, AIs may be better positioned to help people pursue the intimate lives they actually want. Against the mainline Protestant culture of self-care as mourning past intimate lives, the Pauline command to simply "love one another" points toward something both livelier and queerer. With Harris, and against him, the author lands as an apocaloptimist — betting that honest reckoning with the revelation of our anti-human present can still open toward a more human future.

Yet another chapter in Andrew Sullivan's anti-trans story.

Why I Unsubscribed from Andrew Sullivan’s *The Weekly Dish*

Andrew Sullivan gets a few things right: public support for trans freedom has narrowed, and winning elections matters. But when you strip away his reasonable concessions, what remains is not political argument — it is projection. This post applies John Rawls's concept of public reason to Sullivan's anti-trans screeds and finds them wanting. Sullivan's fantasy of gay kids being forced to transition by evil doctors is not a basis for public policy. It is a private obsession dressed up as political commentary. And the real world keeps telling him so.

AI version of hairless cat in *Bubbles,* originally titled *A Child's World,* a 1886 painting by Sir John Everett Millais.

Bubbles, a Reading

In this video, we read from the opening pages of Peter Sloterdijk's Bubbles, the first volume of his monumental Spheres trilogy. In this remarkable passage, Sloterdijk uses the simple image of a child blowing soap bubbles from a balcony to explore something profound: the way human consciousness reaches beyond the boundaries of the body.

Hoshaw's version of Bingen's Creation of the Soul for a post on placental relations, theology, viability, and abortion.

Placental Relations: Theology, Viability, and Roe v. Wade

What if Roe v. Wade was wiser than either its defenders or its critics realized? In this post, I take an unconventional path through medieval theology, Peter Sloterdijk's philosophy of the placenta, and Hildegard of Bingen's vision of ensoulment to argue that the Roe Court's viability standard wasn't arbitrary legal improvisation — it was judicial wisdom rooted in a remarkably consistent convergence of theological tradition and modern medicine. Along the way, I make the case that consistent originalism actually leads to a more radical pro-choice conclusion than Roe ever did, and that Dobbs, for all its claims of constitutional fidelity, is just as extra-legal as the decision it overturned — only less honest about it.